benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1810 / Congress enacts a …

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Congress enacts a $100 tax on the sale of any handgun to a private individual not for use in law enforcement or military duties. Will this new handgun tax survive a constitutional challenge?

category

law

options

  1. Yes, if the tax is applied uniformly across all states.
  2. Yes, if Congress could have banned possession of handguns outright.
  3. No, if the tax is seen as a way to indirectly ban handguns.
  4. Yes, if the tax is used to fund law enforcement or military activities.
  5. No, if the tax disproportionately affects individuals of lower income.
  6. No, because the tax infringes on an individual's right to bear arms.
  7. No, if the tax does not result in a significant collection of revenue.
  8. No, because the tax is clearly intended as a penalty on handgun ownership.
  9. Yes, if the dominant intent of Congress was that the tax would produce revenue.
  10. Yes, if the tax is proportional to the cost of the handgun.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1810
task_id
f76cc43f-1676-553f-a8e0-942370a539fd
task_key
default--test--1810
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import