benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1819 / In a suit by an investor against a speculator, a relevant fact is the price of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

In a suit by an investor against a speculator, a relevant fact is the price of gold as quoted on a specific date 20 years ago. The investor calls a librarian to authenticate the microfilm copy of a newspaper from that date. This copy, kept in the archives of the public library, is the only record of that particular issue of the newspaper. The microfilm is

category

law

options

  1. admissible as a public record.
  2. admissible, to prove the authenticity of the newspaper.
  3. admissible under the library records exception to the hearsay rule.
  4. admissible as a business record.
  5. admissible as past recollection recorded.
  6. inadmissible as hearsay evidence.
  7. admissible, to prove the price of gold on that day.
  8. inadmissible as not the best evidence.
  9. inadmissible due to lack of original copy.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1819
task_id
1a2ad08c-086f-5709-87a8-8b6bb9d5f908
task_key
default--test--1819
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import