benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1832 / A state has enacted a statute imposing a tax on the extraction of all platinum…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A state has enacted a statute imposing a tax on the extraction of all platinum in the state. The extraction of other minerals is not taxed by the state. This is true even though there is considerable mining of silver, turquoise, sulfur, and stone within the state. As a result, the largest platinum mining company in the state has filed suit challenging the constitutionality of the state's platinum tax statute. Which of the following best states the burden of persuasion if the mining company attacks the statute as violating the equal protection of the laws?

category

law

options

  1. The state must convince the court that the tax is rationally related to the advancement of a compelling state interest.
  2. The state must convince the court that the classification in the statute is not necessary to advance a legitimate state interest.
  3. The mining company must convince the court that the classification in this statute is the least restrictive means by which to advance a compelling state interest.
  4. The state must convince the court that the classification in the statute is necessary to advance a compelling state interest.
  5. The mining company must convince the court that the tax is not necessary to advance a legitimate state interest.
  6. The state must convince the court that the classification in this statute is the least restrictive means by which to advance a compelling state interest.
  7. The mining company must convince the court that the classification in this statute is not rationally related to the advancement of a legitimate state interest.
  8. The mining company must convince the court that the classification in this statute is not necessary to advance a compelling state interest.
  9. The state must convince the court that the classification in the statute is rationally related to the advancement of a legitimate state interest.
  10. The mining company must convince the court that the classification in this statute is the most restrictive means by which to advance a legitimate state interest.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1832
task_id
0fdc5b53-6aa9-52ba-a5f6-7378f33617a3
task_key
default--test--1832
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import