benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1843 / A prominent judge lived next door to a father. Recently, the judge had sentenced…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A prominent judge lived next door to a father. Recently, the judge had sentenced the father's son to six months in prison on a narcotics charge. One afternoon while the judge was mowing his lawn, the father decided to avenge his son's conviction. The father set up his water sprinkler behind some shrubbery separating their adjoining properties. As the judge was mowing his lawn and came within reach of the water sprinkler, the father turned on the sprinkling device. The judge did not see the water coming toward him. The water hit the judge in the back and drenched him. The judge would be able to recover against the father for which of the following tort or torts?

category

law

options

  1. Trespass to land and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  2. Assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  3. Negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  4. Trespass to chattels and battery.
  5. Negligence and battery.
  6. Assault and trespass to chattels.
  7. Battery and trespass to land.
  8. Negligence and assault.
  9. Battery, assault and trespass to land.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import