benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1881 / A state law provides for an award of damages against anyone who publishes the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A state law provides for an award of damages against anyone who publishes the name of a rape victim. Pursuant to that law, a woman sued a local newspaper in state court after the newspaper identified her as a rape victim. The state trial and appellate courts rejected the claim, holding that the state law was invalid under both the state constitution and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The state supreme court affirmed, holding specifically: "We think that this well-intentioned law very likely violates the First Amendment of the federal Constitution. We need not, however, decide that issue, because the law assuredly violates our state constitution, which provides even greater protection to the right of the press to report the news." The woman petitioned for review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Is the U.S. Supreme Court likely to review the state supreme court judgment?

category

law

options

  1. No, because the woman already had the opportunity to present her case in the state courts.
  2. No, because the First Amendment prohibits the imposition of liability for the publication of truthful information.
  3. Yes, because the state supreme court made a constitutional error in its judgment.
  4. No, because the U.S. Supreme Court generally does not review cases involving state laws.
  5. No, because the judgment of the state supreme court rests upon an adequate and independent state-law ground.
  6. Yes, because the U.S. Supreme Court has the power to review decisions of state supreme courts.
  7. No, because the state supreme court's judgment was based on its interpretation of its own state's constitution.
  8. Yes, because the First Amendment rights of the press are at stake.
  9. Yes, because the supremacy clause does not permit a state to create rights greater than those conferred by the federal Constitution.
  10. Yes, because the U.S. Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction extends to cases arising under federal law.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1881
task_id
863ac9b2-ff20-5bbb-b201-07ac4d085369
task_key
default--test--1881
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import