benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1896 / An experienced equestrian rider sued a woman, claiming that her horse kicked and…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

An experienced equestrian rider sued a woman, claiming that her horse kicked and injured the rider. At trial, the rider testified that he was attending a horse show when, without provocation, he was kicked by a gray stallion with a black tail. The rider then called the woman as an adverse witness and asked her the following question: "Isn't it true that you are the owner and trainer of a gray stallion with a black tail?" After answering affirmatively, the woman was not asked any further questions on direct examination. Whereupon in cross- examination, the woman was then asked, "Isn't it true that your horse is very gentle and would not kick anyone unless provoked?"Upon objection by the rider's attorney, the rider's strongest argument would be that the woman's proffered testimony is

category

law

options

  1. inadmissible, because it is hearsay evidence.
  2. inadmissible as an improper form of impeachment.
  3. inadmissible as substantive evidence to show that the horse must have been provoked.
  4. inadmissible, because the woman's testimony contradicts the rider's account.
  5. inadmissible as beyond the scope of the woman's direct testimony.
  6. admissible as it provides evidence of the horse's general behavior.
  7. inadmissible, because the woman's testimony is biased.
  8. admissible as it is relevant to the case.
  9. admissible, because it can refute the rider's claim.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1896
task_id
d9ab7171-ab26-548b-a705-4ef263aa6862
task_key
default--test--1896
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import