benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1947 / A scientist used his car to transport a large quantity of highly flammable…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A scientist used his car to transport a large quantity of highly flammable petroleum derivatives that he needed for his scientific research. The petroleum derivatives were sold in ordinary glass gallon jugs. Shortly after putting the jugs in the back of his car, the scientist was driving along a city street. He was thinking about a difficult scientific question and not paying attention to his driving. As a result, he lost control of the car and drove up onto the sidewalk. The car flipped over. The glass jugs in the back of the car were broken, and the chemicals in them spilled out onto the sidewalk. Moments later, a doctor who witnessed the accident came running over to render medical assistance. As he approached the overturned car, however, the doctor slipped on the petroleum derivatives that had spilled onto the sidewalk. The doctor fell and fractured his ankle. If the doctor asserts a claim against the scientist based on strict liability, will the doctor prevail?

category

law

options

  1. No, because the doctor should have been more careful around the accident site.
  2. No, because the scientist was legally transporting the chemicals for his research.
  3. Yes, because the scientist was not exercising reasonable care in driving and handling dangerous chemicals.
  4. Yes, because the scientist was engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity by transporting highly flammable petroleum derivatives in his car.
  5. Yes, because the scientist should have warned the doctor about the chemicals.
  6. No, because it was unforeseeable that the doctor's injury would result from the type of harm threatened.
  7. Yes, because the scientist should have used a safer method to transport the chemicals.
  8. No, because the chemicals were not the direct cause of the doctor's injury.
  9. Yes, because the transportation of flammable petroleum derivatives in glass jugs necessarily involves a high degree of risk of serious harm.
  10. No, because the doctor assumed the risk by voluntarily acting as a Good Samaritan.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1947
task_id
fadd06ba-3238-57ce-bd3d-149cfe79b1a2
task_key
default--test--1947
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import