benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 2703 / If a psychologist acts as both a fact witness for the plaintiff and an expert…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

If a psychologist acts as both a fact witness for the plaintiff and an expert witness for the court in a criminal trial, she has acted:

category

psychology

options

  1. unethically unless she obtains a waiver from the plaintiff.
  2. ethically as long as she did not have a prior relationship with the plaintiff.
  3. unethically unless she has a prior relationship with the defendant.
  4. ethically as long as she maintains neutrality throughout the trial.
  5. ethically only if she has a prior relationship with the defendant.
  6. unethically by accepting dual roles.
  7. unethically because she has a conflict of interest.
  8. ethically as long as she clarifies her roles with all parties.
  9. ethically as long as she does not share confidential information.
  10. ethically as long as she obtains a waiver from the court.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_psychology

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
2703
task_id
1e49547e-f0f3-53e6-bafc-f0a4e15fe2a6
task_key
default--test--2703
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import