benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 5371 / In the debate about the 'managerial revolution', John Scott (1997) argued that:

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

In the debate about the 'managerial revolution', John Scott (1997) argued that:

category

other

options

  1. managers were becoming dissatisfied with their working conditions and planned to overthrow the owners of businesses
  2. owners still exercised control through groups of shareholders and interlocking directorships
  3. ownership and management were becoming increasingly separate functions
  4. the managerial revolution was a myth, as owners still held the majority of power in businesses
  5. managers were planning to unionize to negotiate better working conditions
  6. the principles of scientific management were universally applicable
  7. management was becoming increasingly dependent on shareholders
  8. the techniques of scientific management were overly bureaucratic and inefficient
  9. owners and managers were merging into a single role within businesses
  10. owners were losing control over their businesses due to increasing management autonomy

src

ori_mmlu-sociology

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import