benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 882 / A man was charged with tax fraud. He wished to offer evidence, on his behalf, of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man was charged with tax fraud. He wished to offer evidence, on his behalf, of his honesty while running for mayor. During his political campaign, he refused to lie about a psychiatric problem in his past, and his honesty cost him the election. The man was quoted as saying, "If I lied, I'd be mayor today, but that's no way to win an election. "The BEST argument of the objector to such evidence in the tax fraud case would be which of the following?

category

law

options

  1. The defendant's honesty during his political campaign has no bearing on his honesty in financial matters.
  2. The evidence is biased as it is coming from the defendant himself.
  3. The man's honesty in one situation doesn't necessarily apply to all situations.
  4. Character evidence is not admissible in such cases.
  5. One incident doesn't prove character.
  6. The evidence could sway the jury's opinion unfairly.
  7. This is an impermissible way to prove character.
  8. The tax fraud case and the political campaign are two separate incidents.
  9. The incident is too far in the past to be relevant.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import