benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 899 / A man and a woman were passengers on a plane. They were seated next to one…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man and a woman were passengers on a plane. They were seated next to one another in the first- class section of the plane. Midway through the flight, the woman excused herself and went to the restroom. While she was gone, the man rummaged through the woman's purse and stole $100 in cash. Unknown to the man, a flight attendant saw him steal the money. As is customary in such situations, the flight attendant radioed ahead, and police officers arrested the man when the plane landed. The man was subsequently charged with violating an applicable federal larceny statute. During the trial, the prosecuting attorney called the man's wife as a willing witness against her husband. She proposed to testify that the man confided to her that he did steal the woman's money during the flight. The man's attorney objected on the grounds of hearsay and privilege. The wife's proposed testimony is

category

law

options

  1. admissible, because it is privileged, though it is not hearsay.
  2. admissible, because it is neither hearsay nor privileged.
  3. admissible, because it is hearsay within a recognized exception and not privileged.
  4. inadmissible, both because it discloses a privileged communication and because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
  5. admissible, both because it discloses a privileged communication and because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
  6. inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception, and it discloses a privileged communication.
  7. inadmissible, because it discloses a privileged communication, though it is not hearsay.
  8. admissible, both because it does not disclose a privileged communication and because it is hearsay within a recognized exception.
  9. inadmissible, because it is hearsay within a recognized exception, though it is not privileged.
  10. inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception, though it is not privileged.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
899
task_id
b5184e80-e39e-5ce1-a360-a6c3f10bd653
task_key
default--test--899
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import