benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 937 / A man kidnapped a victim in State A and transported the victim across the state…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man kidnapped a victim in State A and transported the victim across the state border into State B. These actions violated the kidnapping laws of both states, which are identical. A jury convicted the man in a State A court, but the trial judge gave what prosecutors in State B deemed an unduly lenient sentence. The state prosecutor in State B then commenced a kidnapping case against the man for violating State B's kidnapping statute. The man's lawyer has filed a motion in State B to dismiss the charge based on the double jeopardy protection against a second prosecution for the man's single act of kidnapping. Should the court grant the motion to dismiss?

category

law

options

  1. No, because the man committed two separate acts of kidnapping, one in each state.
  2. Yes, because the man was already tried and convicted for the same crime in State A.
  3. Yes, because the double jeopardy protection applies to both state and federal laws.
  4. No, because the man's conduct violated the laws of two different states, and each has the right to enforce its laws. right to enforce its laws.
  5. No, because the double jeopardy protection only applies to federal law.
  6. Yes, because the double jeopardy protection applies even when laws of different states are identical.
  7. No, because the man's sentence in State A was deemed unduly lenient in State B.
  8. Yes, because the government is collaterally estopped under the double jeopardy protection from prosecuting a defendant a second time for the same conduct that led to an earlier conviction.
  9. Yes, because the double jeopardy protection prohibits a second prosecution following a conviction for the same offense.
  10. No, because the double jeopardy protection only prohibits a second prosecution following an acquittal for the same offense.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
937
task_id
c2bb6d57-c2f7-522a-bf5c-cba4c415317e
task_key
default--test--937
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import