benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 957 / A man entered into a written contract with a nationally famous artist. Their…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man entered into a written contract with a nationally famous artist. Their contract provided that the artist would paint a full-color portrait of the man, to be delivered by November 1, in exchange for $15,000. A contractual provision recited that the artist "guarantees that the quality of the portrait will be fully satisfactory. "The artist finished the portrait and presented it to the man on November 2. The man looked at the portrait and said, "This is awful! I really expected better. I'm not paying for this!" The artist was enraged by the man's reaction, as he felt the finished portrait was one of his best works. Which of the following arguments would be LEAST helpful to the artist in his efforts to recover on a breach of contract theory?

category

law

options

  1. The man's dissatisfaction is subjective and therefore not a valid reason for non-payment.
  2. The man failed to make an adequate examination of the quality of the portrait.
  3. The man's dissatisfaction with the quality of the portrait was not genuine.
  4. The man had unrealistic expectations of the portrait.
  5. The man did not provide clear guidelines for the portrait.
  6. The artist's reputation should guarantee the quality of the portrait.
  7. Because of a recent hand injury, the artist did not have sufficient time to produce a portrait of a quality satisfactory to the man.
  8. The artist used high-quality materials to create the portrait.
  9. The delay in delivery was due to unforeseen circumstances.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
957
task_id
68d9627b-6d8f-5d67-9b51-976a09269f41
task_key
default--test--957
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import