benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 958 / A defendant was smoking marijuana as he was driving home from work one…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant was smoking marijuana as he was driving home from work one afternoon. A police officer approached him on the freeway and stopped the car to issue a citation for speeding. As the defendant handed the officer his driver's license, the officer smelled burnt marijuana, saw the joint, and saw an open envelope on the seat next to the defendant containing a substance that looked like marijuana. The officer ordered the defendant out of the car, arrested him for unlawful possession of marijuana. The officer then searched the defendant and found a sealed envelope in the defendant's back pocket. Without asking the defendant's permission, the officer opened the envelope and discovered that it contained cocaine. The officer then unzipped one of the jacket pockets on the jacket the defendant was wearing and found more cocaine and arrested the defendant for possession of cocaine. The defendant was taken to the police station and immediately escorted to an interrogation room. He was given his Miranda warnings, waived his rights, and gave a statement admitting to possession of cocaine and marijuana. Which of the following is a correct statement of the applicable legal principles regarding the search of the defendant?

category

law

options

  1. Any evidence found in the possession of the defendant is admissible, regardless of how it was obtained.
  2. One who drives an automobile on a public highway does not have a legitimate expectation of privacy.
  3. If an officer smells marijuana, they are automatically allowed to search the entire vehicle and the person.
  4. The defendant must give explicit permission for the officer to search their personal belongings, even after an arrest has been made.
  5. If an individual effectively consents to a search of their person, the evidence gathered during the search is admissible.
  6. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unlawful searches and seizures, making the search and the evidence inadmissible.
  7. The officer is not permitted to search personal items found on the defendant after the arrest without a warrant.
  8. The exclusionary rule requires that if an officer conducts an unconstitutional search, the evidence acquired in the course of the officer's subsequent activities is inadmissible.
  9. The officer is only allowed to search the defendant after they have been formally charged with a crime.
  10. When a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of an individual, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the person of the individual.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
958
task_id
fc439dd0-dbbe-56e8-b3c3-5b862e979a0d
task_key
default--test--958
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import