benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 974 / Is the ICJ hostile to the idea that an armed attack may arise through a series…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Is the ICJ hostile to the idea that an armed attack may arise through a series of lower intensity, yet cumulative, instances of armed force?

category

law

options

  1. The ICJ has often supported the accumulation theory
  2. The ICJ considers each instance of armed force individually, not cumulatively
  3. The ICJ has never addressed this issue
  4. The concept of an armed attack refers to a single attack, not multiple smaller instances of armed force
  5. The ICJ has shown mixed views on the accumulation theory
  6. In the Nicaragua case the ICJ dismissed the accumulation theory
  7. The ICJ was not hostile to the accumulation theory
  8. The ICJ has consistently rejected the concept of an armed attack arising from cumulative instances
  9. The ICJ has yet to make a definitive ruling on the accumulation theory
  10. The ICJ ruled in favor of the accumulation theory in the Bosnia and Herzegovina case

src

ori_mmlu-international_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
974
task_id
1977f3c0-721f-555b-aaf8-00ede2fc2907
task_key
default--test--974
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import