benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A plaintiff sued a defendant for injuries suffered in an automobile accident…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff sued a defendant for injuries suffered in an automobile accident that occurred six months ago. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant drove through a red light and hit her as she was crossing the street. The posted speed limit at the scene of the accident was 25 m. p. h. In his case-in-chief, the defendant testified that the traffic light was green and he was driving carefully at 20 m. p. h. The plaintiff's attorney did not cross-examine the defendant. Rather, she called a police officer who testified that the defendant told him immediately after the accident that he was going 30 m. p. h. The police officer's testimony is

choices

  1. a prior inconsistent statement and, therefore, admissible to impeach.
  2. hearsay, but admissible as a prior inconsistent statement for any purpose.
  3. admissible, as offered against the defendant.
  4. inadmissible, because the accident report is the best evidence of what the defendant told the police officer.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
0334e5a0-5403-5680-a694-f0f8b99b8dd4
task_key
all--test--0334e5a0-5403-5680-a694-f0f8b99b8dd4
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import