benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A heroin addict voluntarily entered a residential treatment center. A government…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A heroin addict voluntarily entered a residential treatment center. A government undercover agent introduced himself and struck up a friendship with him. The agent asked the addict to obtain heroin for him, but the addict refused. For several weeks the agent continued to plead with and beg the addict to get him drugs; finally, the addict gave in to the pressure and got the drugs. The police promptly arrested him. At trial, the defendant raised the defense of government entrapment. Will the trial court likely dismiss the case based on that argument?

choices

  1. Yes, because this was entrapment in that the intent to commit the crime originated with the government.
  2. No, this was not entrapment because the addict was predisposed to want to obtain drugs due to his status as a drug user.
  3. No, this was not entrapment because the addict went voluntarily to get the drugs; he could have refused.
  4. Yes, this was entrapment because as soon as the agent asked a second time, he had established entrapment under the majority rule.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import