benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Two weeks before an election, a local newspaper published an article implying…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Two weeks before an election, a local newspaper published an article implying that one of the mayoral candidates was a thief. The candidate subsequently lost the election and sued the newspaper for defamation. The newspaper defended on the grounds of truth. At trial, the candidate took the stand and testified that he was not a thief. Thereafter, the newspaper called a witness to testify that three years ago the candidate committed a larceny while employed at his former job. Upon objection by the candidate's attorney, the witness's testimony should be

choices

  1. excluded, because bad acts may not be proved by extrinsic evidence.
  2. excluded, because it is improper character evidence.
  3. admitted as probative evidence of the candidate's character for veracity.
  4. admitted as relevant evidence of the candidate's character as a thief.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import