benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / In the context of military security, which of the following is not an obvious…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

In the context of military security, which of the following is not an obvious benefit of adopting a 'critical' theoretical approach?

choices

  1. A more critical approach to military security studies will allow the inclusion or adoption of non-realist paradigms, such as social constructivism.
  2. Critical analysis of military security will draw attention back to traditional conceptions of the state-centric paradigm which have been neglected in recent years, with states favouring human security and other non-traditional approaches instead.
  3. By implementing a critical analysis we can recognise that traditional conceptions of military security are no longer always salient and may need to be reconsidered.
  4. A critical approach would recognise the changing ontology of security in the real world. Such changes are evident in the new ways in which war has been conducted in the 20th and 21st century.

subject

security_studies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
1f0b95ea-895d-5084-bc86-5e989b1b079c
task_key
all--test--1f0b95ea-895d-5084-bc86-5e989b1b079c
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import