benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A husband visits an attorney seeking a divorce because of his wife's infidelity.…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A husband visits an attorney seeking a divorce because of his wife's infidelity. At the client consultation, the attorney's secretary took notes. With the permission bf the husband, the attorney's law clerk also sat in on the consultation to see how the attorney conducted these meetings. Shortly after this initial consultation with the attorney, the secretary quit. During the divorce trial, the wife's attorney seeks to call the secretary to testify about what the husband told the attorney during the initial client consultation. Upon objection, the secretary's proposed testimony will most likely be

choices

  1. admissible, because her presence during the meeting destroyed the attorney-client privilege.
  2. admissible, because the law clerk's presence during the meeting destroyed the attorney- client privilege.
  3. inadmissible, because the attorney-client privilege disqualifies the secretary from testifying to such confidential communications.
  4. inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import