benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A grocery store purchased a large mirror to hang on a wall in the store. Along…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A grocery store purchased a large mirror to hang on a wall in the store. Along with the mirror itself, the manufacturer provided brackets and bolts to be used for hanging the mirror. The grocery store paid a local carpenter to come in and hang the mirror. A few days after the carpenter installed the mirror, the mirror suddenly fell from the wall because of a defect in the brackets. It struck a shopper on the head, causing serious injuries to him. If the shopper asserts a claim against the carpenter based on strict liability in tort, the plaintiff will

choices

  1. prevail, because the brackets were defective when installed.
  2. prevail, because it would be abnormally dangerous to maintain such a large mirror on the wall of a retail outlet.
  3. not prevail, because the carpenter was not engaged in the sale of the mirror.
  4. not prevail, because the carpenter had no relationship of privily with the plaintiff.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import