benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A wholesaler brought a federal diversity action against a large pharmaceutical…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A wholesaler brought a federal diversity action against a large pharmaceutical company for breach of contract. During jury selection, one potential juror stated that five years earlier he had been an employee of the company and still owned sev-eral hundred shares of its stock. In response to questioning from the judge, the potential juror stated that he could fairly consider the evidence in the case. The wholesaler's attorney has asked the judge to strike the potential juror for cause. Should the judge strike the potential juror for cause?

choices

  1. No, because the potential juror said that he could fairly consider the evidence in the case.
  2. No, because the wholesaler's attorney could use a peremptory challenge to strike the potential juror.
  3. Yes, because other potential jurors still remain available for the jury panel.
  4. Yes, because the potential juror is presumed to be biased because of his relationship to the company.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
311882c0-1d31-5083-83bd-15bf0ed14453
task_key
all--test--311882c0-1d31-5083-83bd-15bf0ed14453
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import