benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / What differences emerged with regard to theorizing on both sides of the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

What differences emerged with regard to theorizing on both sides of the Atlantic?

choices

  1. From a US perspective, it is common to regard the main voice of security to be external. The question of what should or what should not count as security issues and how to conceptualize security.
  2. The European school is based on a hegemonic form of knowledge. Knowledge is conceived as the understanding of causal mechanisms in relation to the material on which they act.
  3. The different forms of knowledge relate to a conflicting conception of the relationship to policy: the problem-solving tradition in US political science vs. the critical studies in Europe.
  4. Theorizing has parallel theoretical forms of knowledge based on empirically substantiated cause-and-effect relationships.

subject

security_studies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
3c5221d5-b78e-5af8-856d-90296293f14e
task_key
all--test--3c5221d5-b78e-5af8-856d-90296293f14e
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import