benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A defendant has been charged with committing the armed robbery of a convenience…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant has been charged with committing the armed robbery of a convenience store. During the defendant's case-in-chief, the defendant called several character witnesses to testify as to his good character. As part of the prosecution's rebuttal, the defendant's ex-wife was called to testify that during their marriage the defendant had a violent temper, beat her frequently, and once threatened her with a knife. The ex-wife's testimony should be ruled

choices

  1. admissible, because it is relevant to the crime charged.
  2. admissible, because the defendant opened the door by introducing evidence of his good character.
  3. inadmissible, because the defendant will be able to prevent the testimony using the spousal testimony privilege.
  4. inadmissible, because character evidence may not be introduced in this manner.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
44d42a2e-8907-52ba-a575-c5e499715a25
task_key
all--test--44d42a2e-8907-52ba-a575-c5e499715a25
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import