benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A defendant was indicted for engaging in a fraudulent investment scheme. At the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant was indicted for engaging in a fraudulent investment scheme. At the criminal trial, the prosecutor called a witness who had participated in the scheme with the defendant. The witness testified about the operation of the scheme and was cross-examined by the defendant's attorney. The case resulted in a mistrial. An investor who was allegedly defrauded by the scheme has now brought a civil action against the defendant. She seeks to introduce the witness's testimony from the criminal trial. The witness has testimony from the criminal trial. The witness has moved to a foreign country. Is the witness's testimony in the criminal trial admissible in the civil action?

choices

  1. No, because the burden of proof in a criminal action is different from the burden of proof in a civil action.
  2. No, because the parties are not identical in the two actions.
  3. Yes, because it is prior testimony of an unavailable declarant.
  4. Yes, but only if the investor demonstrates that she was unable to obtain the testimony of the witness by deposition.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import