benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A plaintiff sued a utility company that owns a reservoir that is open to the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff sued a utility company that owns a reservoir that is open to the public for recreation pursuant to a license from a federal agency. The plaintiff was severely injured in the reservoir when he dove from a boat into what he thought was deep water and hit an unmarked submerged island. The plaintiff alleges that the company was negligent in failing to mark the submerged island. At trial, the plaintiff has called an engineer and qualified him as plaintiff has called an engineer and qualified him as an expert in managing reservoirs. Which of the following opinions by the plaintiff's expert is the court most likely to admit?

choices

  1. "The accident probably occurred in the manner shown by this computer-animated film I made."
  2. "The company could have marked the island in a day and at a cost of $300."
  3. "The company was required by federal law to mark the island."
  4. "The plaintiff was not contributorily negligent."

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
527f0a0e-e25f-533f-9b76-823a3995a63a
task_key
all--test--527f0a0e-e25f-533f-9b76-823a3995a63a
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import