benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A woman from State A filed an action against a retailer in a state court in…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A woman from State A filed an action against a retailer in a state court in State B. The complaint alleged that the retailer had not delivered $100,000 worth of goods for which the woman had paid. Twenty days after being served, the retailer, which is incor-porated in State C and has its principal place of business in State B, filed a notice of removal in a federal district court in State B. Was the action properly removed?

choices

  1. No, because the notice of removal was not timely filed.
  2. No, because the retailer is a citizen of State B.
  3. Yes, because the parties are citizens of different states and more than $75,000 is in controversy.
  4. Yes, because the retailer is a citizen of both State B and State C.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import