benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Which of the following describes the fallacy of appeal to common practice?

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which of the following describes the fallacy of appeal to common practice?

choices

  1. eliminating a source of evidence from consideration by claiming the source is flawed, when there is no true relationship between the alleged flaw and the reliability of the source
  2. reasoning that an act or series of acts should be carried out because they will have no significant consequences, when there is no evidence there will be no consequences
  3. drawing a conclusion after purposely leaving out evidence or ignoring known evidence that might contradict a claim
  4. arguing that something is the right thing to do based only on evidence that other people are already doing it.

subject

logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
5fd8c030-93ca-5f0b-8005-9900f648e597
task_key
all--test--5fd8c030-93ca-5f0b-8005-9900f648e597
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import