benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / According to Norcross, any attempt to justify the claim that humans have a…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 According to Norcross, any attempt to justify the claim that humans have a higher moral status than other animals by appealing to some version of rationality as the morally relevant difference between humans and animals will

choices

  1. fail to give an adequate answer to the argument from marginal cases.
  2. fail to make the case that such a difference is morally relevant to the status of animals as moral patients as opposed to their status as moral agents.
  3. both A and B
  4. neither A nor B

subject

moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import