benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A plaintiff was hit and injured by a falling branch on a sidewalk in front of a…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff was hit and injured by a falling branch on a sidewalk in front of a convenience store. The plaintiff calls a woman to testify. The woman proposes to testify that a witness who is now deceased told the woman that when he was walking past the convenience store one week before the plaintiff was hit by the branch, the witness saw an employee of the convenience store shoveling snow from the sidewalk in front of the store. The woman's testimony is

choices

  1. admissible, because the witness is unavailable to testify.
  2. admissible, as relevant for the limited purpose of proving that the convenience store owner retained control over the sidewalk where the accident occurred.
  3. inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
  4. inadmissible, because of the Dead Man's Statute.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
6c6228eb-acce-57b9-b37f-7c1028500287
task_key
all--test--6c6228eb-acce-57b9-b37f-7c1028500287
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import