benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A city passed a picketing ordinance. Section 202 of that ordinance…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A city passed a picketing ordinance. Section 202 of that ordinance reads:"Section 202. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in picketing before or about the residence of an individual. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit the holding of a meeting or assembly on any premises used for the discussion of subjects of general public interest. "A group of teachers who work for a public school inside of the city were angry that the principal decreased their salaries. The teachers reacted by picketing on the lawn of the principal's privately owned house. The teachers were charged with violating Section 202 of the ordinance. The teachers have filed suit attacking the constitutionality of Section 202. The court will most likely declare Section 202

choices

  1. constitutional, as a permissible time, place, and manner regulation.
  2. constitutional, as a valid exercise of a state's reserved powers under the Tenth Amendment.
  3. unconstitutional, as discriminatory on its face.
  4. unconstitutional, as vague and overbroad.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import