benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Which statement best explains the purpose of Hart's distinction between 'being…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which statement best explains the purpose of Hart's distinction between 'being obliged' and 'having an obligation'?

choices

  1. It demonstrates the difference between the internal and the external aspect of a rule.
  2. It refutes the natural lawyer' view of the role of morality in law.
  3. It explains the nature of power-conferring rules.
  4. It illuminates the concept of a rule.

subject

jurisprudence

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import