benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A defendant, on trial for robbery, took the stand and testified in his own…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant, on trial for robbery, took the stand and testified in his own behalf. On cross-examination, the prosecuting attorney asked the defendant whether he had committed false pretenses by making long-distance telephone calls by the unauthorized use of a credit card number. The defendant replied, "That's a lie, I never did. " In rebuttal, the prosecuting attorney called the court officer to testif' that the defendant admitted committing false pretenses. The court officer further testified, however, that the defendant was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony against others. The court officer's testimony is

choices

  1. admissible, as bearing on the defendant's credibility.
  2. admissible, as bearing on the defendant's guilt.
  3. inadmissible, because the testimony is extrinsic evidence.
  4. inadmissible, because the court order is thebest evidence.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import