benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / The appeal to anonymous authority fallacy consists of

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

The appeal to anonymous authority fallacy consists of

choices

  1. reasoning that an act or series of acts should be carried out because they will have no significant consequences, when there is no evidence there will be no consequences.
  2. arguing that a claim should be accepted based on the evidence that a large number of people accept it
  3. arguing that something should be done because it has been done in the past
  4. arguing a claim should be accepted based only on the assertion that unidentified authorities accept it

subject

logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
85ff61e1-8d01-58ea-864d-56ab0151660f
task_key
all--test--85ff61e1-8d01-58ea-864d-56ab0151660f
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import