benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A pilot was flying his small plane when he experienced engine trouble and was…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A pilot was flying his small plane when he experienced engine trouble and was forced to make an emergency landing. He landed the plane safely in a large yard behind a home located in a relatively remote area. Unfortunately, when he disembarked from the plane, he was attacked and injured by two large dogs kept by the homeowner to discourage trespassers. The homeowner, who had seen the plane land, had ordered the dogs to attack. Several months earlier, the homeowner had posted large signs around the perimeter of the yard warning of the dogs. Does the pilot have a viable claim against the homeowner for battery?

choices

  1. No, because the homeowner had provided adequate warning.
  2. No, because the pilot was a trespasser.
  3. Yes, because the pilot can invoke the privilege of necessity.
  4. Yes, because the pilot could not reasonably have been expected to see the warning signs posted by the homeowner.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
898f8e85-f0c8-5563-94d6-d02d971452a9
task_key
all--test--898f8e85-f0c8-5563-94d6-d02d971452a9
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import