benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A defendant was charged with killing a victim during a barroom fight. The…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant was charged with killing a victim during a barroom fight. The defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense when he was attacked by the victim. At trial, the defendant called a witness who testified that he witnessed the altercation and that the victim was the aggressor. The witness further testified that he has known the defendant for 10 years and that the defendant is a peaceable man who was acting reasonably in self-defense. The prosecution then offered the testimony of the victim's brother-in-law, who proposed to testify that the victim was a peaceable and law-abiding person. Upon objection by the defendant's attorney, the brother-in-law's proposed testimony is

choices

  1. admissible, for the purpose of rebutting the contention that the defendant was a peaceable person.
  2. admissible, for the purpose of repudiating the defendant's claim of self-defense.
  3. inadmissible, because the victim's character cannot be proved by the brother-in-law's testimony.
  4. inadmissible, because the defendant did not directly attack the victim's character.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import