benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Hart writes: '[T]he certification of something as legally valid is not…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Hart writes: '[T]he certification of something as legally valid is not conclusive of the question of obedience ... however great the aura of majesty or authority which the official system may have, its demands must in the end be submitted to a moral scrutiny.' What does this say about the nature of legal positivism?

choices

  1. That legal positivism is unconcerned about the morality of the law.
  2. That validly enacted law should always be obeyed.
  3. That moral issues fall outside the official legal system.
  4. That there is no moral duty to obey an unjust law.

subject

jurisprudence

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import