benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A consumer bought a lawn mower from a department store. It has a prominent…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A consumer bought a lawn mower from a department store. It has a prominent notice on it that it should not be used on a steep hill. The consumer did not read the notice and used the machine on a steep hill. As a result, it falls over and crushes him. He sues on a theory of strict liability, alleging a defect in the manufacture of the product. The manufacturer defends that the consumer misused the product. Will the Court likely grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment based on the indisputable fact that the consumer did not read the warning, which the defendant argued renders the lawsuit invalid as a matter of law?

choices

  1. No, because contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability in a products liability case.
  2. No, because the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous.
  3. Yes, because the consumer assumed the risk of the danger when he used the product on a steep hill.
  4. Yes, because the consumer ignored the warning and misused the product.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import