benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Generally, erotic materials are protected by the First Amendment for a person's…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Generally, erotic materials are protected by the First Amendment for a person's personal use and possession. However, certain erotic material can reach a point where it steps over the boundaries of First Amendment protection. The Supreme Court has held that if material is obscene it does not mandate First Amendment protection. Which of the following most accurately represents one of the prongs of the three-pronged test enunciated by the U.S. Supreme Court's for determining whether a film, book, video or pictorial is obscene and therefore not subject to protection?

choices

  1. Whether the work, taken as a whole and judged by contemporary community standards, would be seen by a sensitive or vulnerable person to appeal to the prurient interest.
  2. Whether the work depicts, in a direct or indirect way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state obscenity law.
  3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
  4. Whether the work has been properly judged from a national standard to offend sensitive standards of community morals.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import