benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to testify that he formerly knew the defendant as an army supply sergeant and that the defendant had turned down many opportunities for black marketeering. Is the witness's testimony admissible?

choices

  1. No, because it is irrelevant to the present charge.
  2. No, because the defendant may not prove his good character by specific instances of good conduct.
  3. Yes, because a criminal defendant may prove his good character as a basis for inferring conduct.
  4. Yes, because, by accusing the defendant of being a thief, the prosecution has put his character in issue.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import