benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A man suffered frostbite when he spilled a soft drink on his lap that he had…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man suffered frostbite when he spilled a soft drink on his lap that he had purchased from a restaurant. The man sued the restaurant for negligence and damages. At trial, the man's attorney calls a witness to testify that the witness also suffered frostbite when she spilled a soft drink in her lap that she had purchased at the restaurant two weeks earlier. The witness also states that she told the restaurant about her injury immediately after suffering it. Upon objection by the restaurant's attorney, the trial judge should rule the witness's testimony

choices

  1. admissible to prove the restaurant's negligence, provided that the court gives a cautionary instruction that the testimony should not be considered as bearing on the issue of damages.
  2. admissible to prove that the restaurant should have been aware of the danger of frostbite posed by its soft drinks.
  3. inadmissible, because it is not probative of a fact in issue.
  4. inadmissible, because it seeks to put into evidence separate, unrelated transactions with a third party.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import