benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / The question of whether the killing/letting die distinction is morally relevant…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 The question of whether the killing/letting die distinction is morally relevant can be posed by asking whether we are equally to blame for allowing people in Third World countries to starve as we would be for

choices

  1. killing them by sending poisoned food.
  2. refusing to give them the money they need to purchase food.
  3. withholding medicine that they need to survive.
  4. depriving them of knowledge they need to produce food.

subject

moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import