benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A plaintiff sued an industrial facility in her neighborhood for injuries to her…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff sued an industrial facility in her neighborhood for injuries to her health caused by air pollution. At trial, the plaintiff was asked questions on direct examination about the days on which she had observed large amounts of dust in the air and how long the condition had lasted. She testified that she could not remember the specific times, but that she maintained a diary in which she had accurately recorded this information on a daily basis. When her attorney sought to refresh her recollection with her diary, she still could not remember. The plaintiff's attorney seeks to have the information in the diary admitted at trial. Is the information admissible?

choices

  1. No, because reviewing it did not refresh the plaintiff's recollection.
  2. No, unless it is offered by the defendant.
  3. Yes, and the plaintiff should be allowed the option of reading it into evidence or having the diary received as an exhibit.
  4. Yes, and the plaintiff should be allowed to read the diary into evidence.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import