benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A national association brought suit in federal court against a city. The suit…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A national association brought suit in federal court against a city. The suit charged the city with violating several federal statutes. During the trial, the association's attorney called the city attorney as an adverse witness. The city attorney asserted the attorney-client privilege and objected that the matters communicated to him were intended to be confidential. The issues raised by the objections of the city attorney should be resolved under

choices

  1. federal privilege law.
  2. the privilege law of the forum state.
  3. either federal privilege law or the privilege law of the forum state as determined by the court.
  4. either federal privilege law or the privilege law of the forum state, whichever the court determines is more likely to admit the evidence.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
e49df2a5-593b-53c1-af67-8c9bacacec46
task_key
all--test--e49df2a5-593b-53c1-af67-8c9bacacec46
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import