benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A woman and her neighbor had often talked about the need for a fence between…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A woman and her neighbor had often talked about the need for a fence between their properties. Finally, the woman hired a handyman to build a wooden stake fence between her property and her neighbor's property for 10,000.Thehandymanbuiltthefenceasagreed,andthewomanpaidhimthesumof10,000. The handyman built the fence as agreed, and the woman paid him the sum of 10,000. Two weeks later, the neighbor was operating his lawn mower near the property line between his and the woman's property when a section of the fence suddenly fell on top of him, seriously injuring him. A subsequent investigation revealed that the handyman did not properly reinforce the fence. Which of the following is the handyman's best defense in a contract action brought against him by the neighbor, in which the only damages alleged are those for the neighbor's personal injuries?
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
A woman and her neighbor had often talked about the need for a fence between their properties. Finally, the woman hired a handyman to build a wooden stake fence between her property and her neighbor's property for 10,000.Thehandymanbuiltthefenceasagreed,andthewomanpaidhimthesumof10,000. Two weeks later, the neighbor was operating his lawn mower near the property line between his and the woman's property when a section of the fence suddenly fell on top of him, seriously injuring him. A subsequent investigation revealed that the handyman did not properly reinforce the fence. Which of the following is the handyman's best defense in a contract action brought against him by the neighbor, in which the only damages alleged are those for the neighbor's personal injuries?
Original LaTeX notation
A woman and her neighbor had often talked about the need for a fence between their properties. Finally, the woman hired a handyman to build a wooden stake fence between her property and her neighbor's property for $10,000. The handyman built the fence as agreed, and the woman paid him the sum of $10,000. Two weeks later, the neighbor was operating his lawn mower near the property line between his and the woman's property when a section of the fence suddenly fell on top of him, seriously injuring him. A subsequent investigation revealed that the handyman did not properly reinforce the fence. Which of the following is the handyman's best defense in a contract action brought against him by the neighbor, in which the only damages alleged are those for the neighbor's personal injuries?

choices

  1. Damages for personal injuries cannot be recovered in a contract action.
  2. Damages for personal injuries to the neighbor were not within the contemplation of the woman and the handyman at the time they entered into their agreement.
  3. The neighbor is only an incidental beneficiary of the agreement between the woman and the handyman.
  4. The neighbor has no standing to assert such an action, since he was not a party to the agreement between the woman and the handyman.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import