benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / Defendant was on trial for robbery. Defendant's direct examination continued…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Defendant was on trial for robbery. Defendant's direct examination continued until late in the day when it finally concluded. At this time, the trial court judge adjourned the proceedings for the evening. The judge then instructed Defendant not to speak with anyone during the night and scheduled cross- examination to begin in the morning. The judge's instruction to Defendant was

choices

  1. proper, because a judge has broad discretion to instruct witnesses in such a manner.
  2. proper, because it would have the same effect as permitting cross-examination to continue after direct was concluded.
  3. improper, because it violates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
  4. improper, because it violates the attorney-client privilege.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
f1614658-2888-5295-b1ca-38e200d0a66c
task_key
all--test--f1614658-2888-5295-b1ca-38e200d0a66c
task_revision_id
1
config / split
all / test

Official source

initial import