benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MuSR / Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?

narrative

As the sun dipped below the horizon on a Tuesday, I found myself in my office, poring over the profiles of my team: Amanda, Richard, and Kelly. The bustling theme park we operated had two crucial roles to fill - delivering captivating performances to entertain our guests and ensuring security within our lively amusement paradise.

Amanda was an energetic spirit. Our community had always admired her lively, enthusiastic stage presence in numerous local theatre productions. She had a knack for capturing the audience's attention with her charismatic displays. However, she lacked the physical training required for security roles; not to mention she tends to panic in stressful situations, which could quickly escalate in an arena like our park. Additionally, she vocally criticized Richard's approach to maintaining security, as if she questioned his competence in that area. 

However, when it came to working with Kelly on performance routines, there was a disconnect. Amanda struggled to understand Kelly's creative thought process which often led to communication issues. Kelly, on the other hand, found Amanda's way of giving instructions during rehearsals too blunt, misinterpreting her succinct communication as impoliteness. 

Then there was Kelly - a creative mind, but with no experience in performing before an actual audience. Worse still, he had a case of stage fright and tended to freeze up on stage. Kelly also did not possess the strong physique typically needed for a security personnel role. Plus, he often allowed himself to be distracted by amusement park rides and shows, which was less than ideal for someone tasked with security. He also had a sour tendency to criticize Richard's work. 

Richard, meanwhile, came across to most as a lone wolf. He had a monotone voice, which didn’t make him the best choice for engaging the audience in our shows. On top of that, Richard showed little inclination to learn and remember the choreography for performances. Despite Amanda's occasional theatre-centric inputs during team meetings, Richard didn't seem to take them seriously, often brushing them off.

However, his past role as a night watchman at a warehouse spoke of his ability in the security department. He kept his cool, whether under pressure, or when Kelly would make less-than-constructive comments about his work. He knew how to maintain order effectively, making him a top contender for this position.

Quietly mulling over the files, one thing was certain - each person had their unique strengths and weaknesses. It was my job to assign them their roles, to make the right decisions that would keep our ambitious theme park running like a well-oiled machine.

choices

  • Perform shows: Amanda, Provide security: Kelly and Richard
  • Perform shows: Kelly, Provide security: Amanda and Richard
  • Perform shows: Richard, Provide security: Amanda and Kelly

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
53a54d82-d163-5cc4-9c20-00d4e808a5ee
task_key
default--team~5fallocation--53a54d82-d163-5cc4-9c20-00d4e808a5ee
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / team_allocation

Official source

initial import