benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MuSR / Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Given the story, how would you uniquely allocate each person to make sure both tasks are accomplished efficiently?

narrative

Within the confines of a nondescript building inside a vast military base, I found myself immersed in deep contemplation. As the manager of a defense organization, the weighty responsibility of role assignment for our imminent operations fell on my shoulders. My team comprised of three proficient individuals - Alexander, Kevin, and Laura. Their potential roles, Ground Operations and Strategy Planning, were as intricate as they were indispensable. Ground Operations required nerves of steel and survival instincts, while Strategy Planning was the vital cog that drove the colossal machinery of our operations.

Alexander was a sturdy, seasoned soldier, his demeanor often as calm as a placid lake. His decision-making prowess shone brightest during the most intense, high-pressure situations, a quality carved out of extensive survival training he undertook in varying terrains. However, behind his wisdom and calm, lay an Achilles' heel; Alexander often overlooked potential threats in his strategies. More than once, his peers had suffered due to his lapses, with Kevin once missing an all-important meeting because the message had slipped Alexander's mind. Moreover, his dismissive nature towards Laura's strategic plans without offering any constructive criticism had also driven a rift between the two.

Kevin, on the other hand, was like an old faithful; dependable but not without his flaws. His biggest shortcoming was his inability to gauge the necessary resources for any given task accurately. The fiery temper blooming under stress was also an issue; it didn't help that he held back essential information from Laura out of proactive spite. His feud with Alexander had once reached a boiling point, blaming him openly for a failed project. Add to that Kevin's struggling survival skills and a propensity to forget vital details of plans, and one realized his liabilities amidst his steadfast grit.

Laura was the mind among the muscles, armed with a degree in Military Strategy from a renowned university. She had proved her mettle behind a successful military operation that was her brainchild. Her outspoken nature was both a strength and a weakness, as she publicly criticized Alexander's tactical decisions during debriefs, not stepping back even when reporting Kevin's mistakes to superiors. But her Achilles' heel lay in her nerves that fumbled in the field; she was once found to have left her communication device behind during a live drill.

Juggling these strengths and weaknesses was my prime duty, assigning each to Ground Operations and Strategy Planning as per their abilities. Taking into account the factors, the decision simmered with challenges, as the choice made would lead our operations to victory or defeat.

choices

  • Ground Operations: Kevin, Strategy Planning: Alexander and Laura
  • Ground Operations: Laura, Strategy Planning: Alexander and Kevin
  • Ground Operations: Alexander, Strategy Planning: Kevin and Laura

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import