benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"It is not always easy to grasp who is consuming which products. The following argument pertains to this question: To begin with, being an owner of a Nag Champa soap is sufficient for being a rare consumer of KMS shampoo. Moreover, every rare consumer of KMS shampoo is not a loyal buyer of Schwarzkopf shampoo or not an owner of a Lush soap. It follows that every owner of a Nag Champa soap is an owner of a Lush soap and a loyal buyer of Schwarzkopf shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
a5d8eea1-b9a6-593f-906a-ea21a25aab7d
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--a5d8eea1-b9a6-593f-906a-ea21a25aab7d
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import