benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10913 / According to some defenders of meat-eating, the suffering of animals counts less…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 According to some defenders of meat-eating, the suffering of animals counts less than the suffering of humans (if at all) because

category

philosophy

options

  1. animals can tolerate more suffering than humans can.
  2. humans are rational and animals are not.
  3. humans have a soul, while animals do not.
  4. animals are rational and humans are not.
  5. animals lack the capacity for suffering, and humans do not.
  6. animals are not sentient beings, unlike humans.
  7. animals do not have emotions, while humans do.
  8. humans are superior to animals in the food chain.
  9. animals are designed by nature to endure suffering.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import